Claims

Pre-test comparison showed no significant difference between experimental and control groups before implementation

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2017 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? A pre-test t-test found no statistically significant difference between the experimental and control groups before the implementation. → Özcan and Kiliç 2017

Evidence

Özcan and Kiliç 2017

Mehmet Fatih Özcan, Latife Kirbaşoğlu Kiliç. (2017). The Effects of Animation Supported 5E Model on Teaching 'Indicative and Subjunctive Moods' in 7th Grade Turkish Lesson. Universal Journal of Educational Research. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2017.051407

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Pre-test t-test on grammar success scores comparing the two groups (25 analysed students each per Table 4). The article reports t(48)=.524, p=.753, finding no significant pre-implementation difference; equivalence was not formally tested beyond this comparison.

"T48=.524 and P=,753, p>0.05 it is observed that the significance level is meaningless. This finding is a significant difference between the experimental and control group before the implementation of value orientations does not suggest that."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.