Polychotomously scored IF-AT physics exam items show excellent discrimination, with a mean item-total correlation of r′ = 0.41 ± 0.13 across 45 items¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · designr2·q2·i2medium
Currency · newest study 2013 · checked against its sources 2026-10-20 (automated, 1 of 1 entry) · not reviewed by a person · overdue for a recheck since 2016: tool and model accuracy changes quickly
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? Across a midterm and final exam administered with the IF-AT in an introductory physics course, the 45 polychotomously scored items had a mean item-total correlation of r′ = 0.41 ± 0.13, which the author characterizes as excellent discrimination for classroom tests. → Slepkov 2013
Evidence¶
Slepkov 2013¶
Slepkov, A. D. (2013). Integrated Testlets and the Immediate Feedback Assessment Technique. https://arxiv.org/abs/1308.4365 doi:10.48550/arxiv.1308.4365
q2 · i2 · design · r2
Item analysis of one case-study course's IF-AT-scored midterm (20 items, 51 students) and final (25 items, 49 students). The author reports "excellent discrimination" with mean polychotomous item-total correlation r′ = 0.41 ± 0.13; only 4 of 45 items fell below a discrimination coefficient of 0.2.
"In total, the polychotomously-scored items are found to allow for excellent discrimination, with a mean item-total correlation measure for the combined 45 items of the two examinations of r′ = 0 . 41 ± 0. 13 (mean ± standard deviation)"
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- IF-AT exam scores correlate with constructed-response quiz scores (r = 0.67), supporting validity — related
- IF-AT-scored physics midterm and final exams yield good test reliability (α = 0.71 and 0.82; α50 = 0.86 and 0.90) — related
- Point-biserial item-total correlation is negatively related to test discriminating value and can be expressed via item and test difficulty and discrimination parameters — related
- Partial credit under the IF-AT is granted in a discriminating manner: top final-exam scorers earned 65% ± 23% of available partial credit versus 39% ± 10% for bottom scorers — related
- Undergraduate physics students react highly positively to the IF-AT format — related
- Item discrimination screening removed eight items using a critical-ratio criterion above 3 — related
- Cumulative correct answers on blended-workshop activities relate to final exam score, but number of attempts does not — related
- Intra-testlet items were slightly more difficult than stand-alone questions (p′ = 0.69 ± 0.15 vs 0.75 ± 0.15) — related
- Survey items show good discrimination overall, but several items exhibit ceiling effects that limit measuring change over time — related
- Partial credit accounts for only a small proportion of IF-AT exam scores, though weaker students depend on it more — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
if-at-integrated-testlet-items-excellent-discrimination |
title |
Polychotomously scored IF-AT physics exam items show excellent discrimination, with a mean item-total correlation of r′ = 0.41 ± 0.13 across 45 items |
description |
Polychotomously scored IF-AT physics exam items show excellent discrimination, with a mean item-total correlation of r′ = 0.41 ± 0.13 across 45 items |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2013 |
source_checked |
2026-10-20 |
recheck_by |
2016 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-09-26 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — slepkov-2013 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.