Claims

Intra-testlet items were slightly more difficult than stand-alone questions (p′ = 0.69 ± 0.15 vs 0.75 ± 0.15)

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · design r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2013 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Across both examinations, intra-testlet items had a slightly lower mean polychotomous difficulty (p′ = 0.69 ± 0.15) than stand-alone questions (p′ = 0.75 ± 0.15). → Slepkov 2013

Evidence

Slepkov 2013

Slepkov, A. D. (2013). Integrated Testlets and the Immediate Feedback Assessment Technique. https://arxiv.org/abs/1308.4365 doi:10.48550/arxiv.1308.4365

q2 · i? · design · r2

Descriptive item-difficulty comparison across the midterm and final exams, where p′ is the mean obtained item score including partial credit. The author reports "the intra-testlet items were slightly more difficult than the stand-alone questions" and notes the spread was largely by design, using easier items as confidence boosters.

"Considering both examinations, the intra-testlet items were slightly more difficult than the stand-alone questions, with p′ = 0. 69 ± 0. 15 and 0.75 ± 0.15,"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id intra-testlet-items-slightly-more-difficult
title Intra-testlet items were slightly more difficult than stand-alone questions (p′ = 0.69 ± 0.15 vs 0.75 ± 0.15)
description Intra-testlet items were slightly more difficult than stand-alone questions (p′ = 0.69 ± 0.15 vs 0.75 ± 0.15)
status review
evidence_strength weak
newest_evidence 2013
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-09-26
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — slepkov-2013

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.