Claims

ILS reuse and edition as a proxy for knowledge appropriation relates to about four times higher adoption (19.77% vs 4.51%)

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associational r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2020 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Adoption rates for reused ILSs were about four times higher than for non-reused ILSs, and this association was statistically significant. → María Jesús Rodríguez-Triana 2020

Evidence

María Jesús Rodríguez-Triana 2020

María Jesús Rodríguez-Triana, Luis P. Prieto, Tobias Ley, Ton de Jong, Denis Gillet. (2020). Social practices in teacher knowledge creation and innovation adoption: a large-scale study in an online instructional design community for inquiry learning. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-020-09331-5

q2 · i? · associational · r2

Observational analysis of 40,235 ILSs where reuse (creating a copy of another user's ILS and editing it) served as a proxy for knowledge appropriation. Adoption rates were 19.77% for reused ILSs versus 4.51% for non-reused ones; the article reports the reused rate as "about four times higher."

"adoption rates for reused ILSs being about four times higher than those created from scratch (or likely to be backup/demo copies). A chi-squared test of independence also rejected the null hypothesis (i.e., independence of appropriation and adoption): χ2 (1, N = 40,235) = 1395.36, p < 0.001."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id ils-reuse-appropriation-proxy-higher-adoption
title ILS reuse and edition as a proxy for knowledge appropriation relates to about four times higher adoption (19.77% vs 4.51%)
description ILS reuse and edition as a proxy for knowledge appropriation relates to about four times higher adoption (19.77% vs 4.51%)
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2020
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-18
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — maría-jesús-rodríguez-triana-2020

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.