All treatment groups showed positive gains immediately after instruction, followed by losses between the contemporaneous and post-instruction assessments¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causalr1·q2
Currency · newest study 2016 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? Every group, regardless of treatment, had positive Cont-Pre gains and negative Post-Cont differences. → Yu 2016
Evidence¶
Yu 2016¶
Yu, K. C., Sahami, K., Denn, G., Sahami, V., & Sessions, L. C. (2016). Immersive Planetarium Visualizations for Teaching Solar System Moon Concepts to Undergraduates. Journal of Astronomy & Earth Sciences Education, 3(2). https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1123383
q2 · i? · causal · r1
Aggregated longitudinal gain analysis (Table 2, plotted in Fig. 1) across the three groups shows immediate post-instruction gains for all students, with all groups losing ground between the contemporaneous and delayed post-instruction assessments; no significance tests are reported for these contrasts.
"All students regardless of which treatment group they were from had positive Cont-Pre gains, which show gains immediately after instruction. However, the Post-Cont differences were all losses"
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- The flat-screen visualization group matched the planetarium group's immediate gains but lost almost all of them by the delayed post-test — related
- Undergraduates taught Solar System moon content in an immersive fulldome planetarium retained a moderate gain (ES = 0.371) at delayed post-test, while non-immersive and no-visualization groups retained almost none — related
- Undergraduates taught seasons with immersive planetarium visualizations show larger quiz gains (ES=0.696 Cont-Pre; ES=0.741 Post-Pre) than peers taught with the same visualizations on a flat classroom screen or with no visualizations — related
- Non-immersive classroom visualization shows no significant contemporaneous-gain advantage over no visualizations, and its Post-Pre advantage reverses relative to the control group — related
- Knowledge and belief gains decayed from immediate post-test to 4-week follow-up regardless of teaching condition — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.