Claims

All treatment groups showed positive gains immediately after instruction, followed by losses between the contemporaneous and post-instruction assessments

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2016 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Every group, regardless of treatment, had positive Cont-Pre gains and negative Post-Cont differences. → Yu 2016

Evidence

Yu 2016

Yu, K. C., Sahami, K., Denn, G., Sahami, V., & Sessions, L. C. (2016). Immersive Planetarium Visualizations for Teaching Solar System Moon Concepts to Undergraduates. Journal of Astronomy & Earth Sciences Education, 3(2). https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1123383

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Aggregated longitudinal gain analysis (Table 2, plotted in Fig. 1) across the three groups shows immediate post-instruction gains for all students, with all groups losing ground between the contemporaneous and delayed post-instruction assessments; no significance tests are reported for these contrasts.

"All students regardless of which treatment group they were from had positive Cont-Pre gains, which show gains immediately after instruction. However, the Post-Cont differences were all losses"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.