Adult learners perceive immersive game-based platforms and interactive AI interfaces as effective mediums for enhancing learner-AI artifact-mediated interaction¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · qualitativer3·q2
Currency · newest study 2025 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? Learners suggested embracing immersive technologies and game-based learning with AI, particularly suited to problem-solving through constant experimentation and reflection. → Jinhee Kim 2025
q2 i? Learners expected AI interfaces to offer multiple communication modalities and evolve from static explanations to dynamic, interactive dialogues. → Jinhee Kim 2025 (2)
Evidence¶
Jinhee Kim 2025¶
Jinhee Kim, Seongryeong Yu, Rita Detrick, Xi Lin, Na Li. (2025). Designing AI-powered learning: adult learners' expectations for curriculum and human-AI interaction. Education Tech Research Dev. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-025-10549-z
q2 · i? · qualitative · r3
Findings on artifact-mediated interaction (theme in 65% of e-portfolios per Table 1); learners named augmented reality, virtual reality, mixed reality, extended reality, haptic technologies, and digital identity.
"the embodied affordances of immersive game-based learning platforms (e.g., gesture, voice, hand controls) allow learners to acquire knowledge intuitively and engage with a heightened sense of presence, enhancing motivation, interest, and knowledge creation"
Jinhee Kim 2025 (2)¶
Jinhee Kim, Seongryeong Yu, Rita Detrick, Xi Lin, Na Li. (2025). Designing AI-powered learning: adult learners' expectations for curriculum and human-AI interaction. Education Tech Research Dev. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-025-10549-z
q2 · i? · qualitative · r3
Findings on artifact-mediated interaction; learners expected interfaces encompassing visual, textual, and auditory modalities to convey information, suggestions, and feedback.
"learners suggested that the interface should evolve from static, model-centric explanations to dynamic, interactive dialogues that grow with the learner's understanding and needs"
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Increased perceptual fidelity fails to reliably improve serious game learning outcomes (the fidelity fallacy) — reports the opposite
- LLM capabilities enabled family education systems across conversational, embodied, and spatial interface forms to generate support from the context of an unfolding interaction — related
- Immersive technologies are rarely adopted in robotics GBL/gamification but studies using them report heightened engagement, improved spatial reasoning, and enhanced perceived realism — related
- Agent realism, particularly behavioral realism, should be a crucial predictor of social presence in immersive agent-centered learning environments — related
- Immersive media environments enable higher visual and behavioral realism of pedagogical agents than non-immersive formats — related
- Measures of presence, enjoyment, entitativity, and realism increased over a 10-week networked-VR course, suggesting XRCL advantages may grow as participants adapt — related
- Digital learning platforms and virtual learning environments enhance knowledge retention and flexibility in orthodontic education — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-29 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.