Claims

Embedding tolerance methodology incidentally in a non-confessional discipline failed when Muslims reached 50% of the group

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2016 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? In a 2014–2015 trial of the methodology within «Fundamentals of law» with a mixed group of 30 students where Muslims reached up to 50%, there was no quality improvement of knowledge of law or confessional preparedness. → Naumenko and Naumenko 2016

Evidence

Naumenko and Naumenko 2016

Evgeny A. Naumenko, Olga N. Naumenko. (2016). Pedagogical Experience on Formation of Tolerant and Multicultural Consciousness of Students. European Journal of Contemporary Education. https://doi.org/10.13187/ejced.2016.17.335

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Trial in a third-year «Economy» group of 30 students with Muslims up to 50%, studying law comparatively across confessional systems (e.g., Sharia and Russian law). The article reports "no quality improvement of knowledge of law" and reports rejection of information and negativism; no statistics are printed.

"The methodology proved to be insufficiently effective. There was no quality improvement of knowledge of law, let alone confessional and ethno -cultural preparedne ss."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.