Individual differences were not associated with the retention benefit of relearning over restudying¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2020 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q2 i? Individual differences were not associated with the benefit of relearning over restudying in the retention tests. → Philip A. Higham 2020

Evidence¶

Philip A. Higham 2020¶

Philip A. Higham, Bettina Zengel, Laura Bartlett, and Julie A. Hadwin (2020). The Benefits of Successive Relearning on Multiple Learning Outcomes. https://osf.io/nx4va/?view_only=049ee04aab4f420e9fa0091b3b69b9d0

q2 · i? · causal · r2

The abstract reports the exploratory moderation analysis (Exploratory Research Question 2) of whether Week-1 individual difference measures moderated the relearning advantage: "Individual differences were not associated with the benefit of relearning over restudying in the retention tests."

"Individual differences were not associated with the benefit of relearning over restudying in the retention tests."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• End-of-semester recall of course material was better for relearning than for restudying — related
• Spaced retrieval practice (successive relearning) produced multi-year retention of foreign language vocabulary in adults, as reported by the review — related
• Testing benefits retention over a conservative restudy control, establishing the testing effect as robust — related
• Self-rated attentional control improves for relearning relative to restudying from the second session onward — related
• Total exposure time per session was significantly lower in the relearn condition than in the restudy condition, ruling out an exposure confound — related
• Anxious affect and self-rated mastery start worse for relearning but reverse in favour of relearning by the third session — related
• Aggregate judgments of learning shift from lower under relearning to higher under relearning across the three sessions — related