Aggregate judgments of learning shift from lower under relearning to higher under relearning across the three sessions¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · causalr2·q2·i2–i3
Currency · newest study 2020 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i3 aJOLs showed a main effect of session qualified by a session × practice task interaction. → Philip A. Higham 2020
q2 i2 By Session 3, aJOLs were higher in the relearn condition than the restudy condition, d = -0.426. → Philip A. Higham 2020 (2)
Evidence¶
Philip A. Higham 2020¶
Philip A. Higham, Bettina Zengel, Laura Bartlett, and Julie A. Hadwin (2020). The Benefits of Successive Relearning on Multiple Learning Outcomes. https://osf.io/nx4va/?view_only=049ee04aab4f420e9fa0091b3b69b9d0
q2 · i3 · causal · r2
A 3 (session) × 2 (practice task) repeated-measures ANOVA on aggregate judgments of learning collected after each practice session. The session main effect "was qualified by an interaction between session and practice task, F(2, 410) = 124.49, p < .001, ηp2 = .378".
"It yielded a main effect of session, F(2, 410) = 261.00, p < .001, ηp2 = .560, which was qualified by an interaction between session and practice task, F(2, 410) = 124.49, p < .001, ηp2 = .378."
Philip A. Higham 2020 (2)¶
Philip A. Higham, Bettina Zengel, Laura Bartlett, and Julie A. Hadwin (2020). The Benefits of Successive Relearning on Multiple Learning Outcomes. https://osf.io/nx4va/?view_only=049ee04aab4f420e9fa0091b3b69b9d0
q2 · i2 · causal · r2
Follow-up t-tests on the interaction compared aJOLs between tasks in Session 3. "The difference reversed in Session 3", with relearn aJOLs (M = 61.44) exceeding restudy (M = 58.17), d = -0.426.
"the difference reversed in Session 3 (restudy: M = 58.17. SD = 15.17; relearn: M = 61.44, SD = 15.03), t(205) = -6.12, p < .001, d = -0.426."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Anxious affect and self-rated mastery start worse for relearning but reverse in favour of relearning by the third session — related
- Self-rated attentional control improves for relearning relative to restudying from the second session onward — related
- First-pass recall accuracy rises while trials-to-criterion and exposure duration fall across the three weekly relearning sessions — related
- Individual differences were not associated with the retention benefit of relearning over restudying — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
relearning-ajol-reversal-across-sessions |
title |
Aggregate judgments of learning shift from lower under relearning to higher under relearning across the three sessions |
description |
Aggregate judgments of learning shift from lower under relearning to higher under relearning across the three sessions |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2020 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-23 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
2 — philip-a-higham-2020, philip-a-higham-2020-2 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.