Claims

Aggregate judgments of learning shift from lower under relearning to higher under relearning across the three sessions

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · causal r2 · q2 · i2–i3
Currency · newest study 2020 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i3 aJOLs showed a main effect of session qualified by a session × practice task interaction. → Philip A. Higham 2020 q2 i2 By Session 3, aJOLs were higher in the relearn condition than the restudy condition, d = -0.426. → Philip A. Higham 2020 (2)

Evidence

Philip A. Higham 2020

Philip A. Higham, Bettina Zengel, Laura Bartlett, and Julie A. Hadwin (2020). The Benefits of Successive Relearning on Multiple Learning Outcomes. https://osf.io/nx4va/?view_only=049ee04aab4f420e9fa0091b3b69b9d0

q2 · i3 · causal · r2

A 3 (session) × 2 (practice task) repeated-measures ANOVA on aggregate judgments of learning collected after each practice session. The session main effect "was qualified by an interaction between session and practice task, F(2, 410) = 124.49, p < .001, ηp2 = .378".

"It yielded a main effect of session, F(2, 410) = 261.00, p < .001, ηp2 = .560, which was qualified by an interaction between session and practice task, F(2, 410) = 124.49, p < .001, ηp2 = .378."

Philip A. Higham 2020 (2)

Philip A. Higham, Bettina Zengel, Laura Bartlett, and Julie A. Hadwin (2020). The Benefits of Successive Relearning on Multiple Learning Outcomes. https://osf.io/nx4va/?view_only=049ee04aab4f420e9fa0091b3b69b9d0

q2 · i2 · causal · r2

Follow-up t-tests on the interaction compared aJOLs between tasks in Session 3. "The difference reversed in Session 3", with relearn aJOLs (M = 61.44) exceeding restudy (M = 58.17), d = -0.426.

"the difference reversed in Session 3 (restudy: M = 58.17. SD = 15.17; relearn: M = 61.44, SD = 15.03), t(205) = -6.12, p < .001, d = -0.426."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id relearning-ajol-reversal-across-sessions
title Aggregate judgments of learning shift from lower under relearning to higher under relearning across the three sessions
description Aggregate judgments of learning shift from lower under relearning to higher under relearning across the three sessions
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2020
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-23
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 2 — philip-a-higham-2020, philip-a-higham-2020-2

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.