Claims

Accounting for group and individual characteristics significantly increased students' swimming ability levels under credit-system training

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2016 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Introduction of an individual approach to the educational process contributed to a significant increase in the level of students' swimming abilities. → Yermahanova 2016

Evidence

Yermahanova 2016

Yermahanova, A., Nurmakhambetova, D., Bozhig, Z., & Imanbetov, A. (2016). Evaluation of Features of Development of Sports Way of Swimming of Students of Various Sports Specialization. International Journal of Environmental & Science Education, 11(18), 10895-10904. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Authors' summary of the pedagogical experiment comparing control (traditional method) and experimental (differentiated program) groups across four sport specializations; the article reports "a significant increase in the level of the swimming abilities" without printing an effect size.

"Thus, by accounting for group and individual characteristics of students, learning, improvements were obtained in the dynamic assessment of swimming ability. Introduction of an individual approach to the educational process contributed to a significant increase in the level of the swimming abilities of students."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.