Students of different sports specializations enter swimming courses with different initial levels and sport-specific technique errors, complicating instruction under limited allocated hours¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causalr1·q1
Currency · newest study 2016 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q1 i? Teacher observations showed students' initial swimming training levels differ, causing difficulties in mastering techniques and extending the learning process. → Yermahanova 2016
Evidence¶
Yermahanova 2016¶
Yermahanova, A., Nurmakhambetova, D., Bozhig, Z., & Imanbetov, A. (2016). Evaluation of Features of Development of Sports Way of Swimming of Students of Various Sports Specialization. International Journal of Environmental & Science Education, 11(18), 10895-10904. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
q1 · i? · causal · r1
Authors' observational statement from the Results and Discussion section, based on teacher observation rather than a controlled measurement; it motivates the differentiated exercise sets. No effect size or test is printed.
"As our teacher observations, the initial level of the swimming training of students is different, which causes considerable difficulties in mastering swimming techniques and extend the learning process."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Differentiated exercise sets produce significantly larger improvements in swimming technique than traditional instruction for students in complex-coordination sports — related
- Accounting for group and individual characteristics significantly increased students' swimming ability levels under credit-system training — related
- Experimental groups across martial arts, sports games and complex-coordination specializations achieved larger gains in breaststroke and back crawl technique than control groups — related
- Cyclic-sport students taught with the differentiated program gained more in front crawl technique (60% gain, 4.45 points) than control students (37.5% gain, 3.92 points) — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.