Claims

The impact of instructional infographics on classroom interaction differs between scientific-college (IT) and humanistic-college (Business) students

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2019 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? A Kruskal-Wallis test found a significant difference between IT and ECO samples on interaction (calculated H = 5.819 exceeding the chi-square value 3.841 at 0.05, 1 df). → Alqudah 2019

Evidence

Alqudah 2019

Alqudah, D., Bidin, A., & Md Hussin, M. A. H. (2019). The Impact of Educational Infographic on Students’ Interaction and Perception in Jordanian Higher Education: Experimental Study. International Journal of Instruction, 12(4), 669-688. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2019.12443a

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Kruskal-Wallis test comparing the two colleges' samples on the interaction variable; Table 8 reports chi-square 5.819, df 1, Asymp. Sig. .016. The null hypothesis of equal impact was rejected, indicating a difference between the scientific college sample (IT students) and the humanistic college sample (ECO students) in infographic impact on interaction.

"As regards the interaction test, the calculated H was 5.819. Consequently, it was more than the approximated chi -square value at 0.05 significance level and 1 degree of freedom, which is 3.841"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.