Claims

Across all four Solomon groups, achievement post-test scores differ significantly, with both infographic groups outperforming both control groups

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2016 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? One-way ANOVA of achievement post-test scores across Experimental I, Control I, Experimental II and Control II shows a statistically significant group difference, with Tukey tests locating the difference between the experimental groups and Control group II. → Çifçi 2016

Evidence

Çifçi 2016

Taner Çifçi. (2016). Effects of Infographics on Students Achievement and Attitude towards Geography Lessons. Journal of Education and Learning, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.5539/jel.v5n1p154

q2 · i? · causal · r2

One-way ANOVA of achievement post-test scores across the four Solomon groups (between-groups sum of squares 2461.2; within-groups 16586.7), finding a "statistically signi ficant difference between the students in the experimental groups and control".

"According to the analysis results given in Table 8, th ere is a statistically signi ficant difference between the students in the experimental groups and control [F(3-109) = 5,391; p < .05]."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.