Participation in the short INSIGHT training session is associated with a significant pre-post increase in teachers’ perceived ease of use of AI-based technologies¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · designr2·q2·i1small
Currency · newest study 2026 · checked against its sources 2026-10-20 (automated, 1 of 1 entry) · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i1 Teachers’ perceived ease of use of AI-based technologies increased significantly from pre- to post-test following INSIGHT, with a small effect (d = −0.25 as printed). → Mesenhöller J and Böhme K 2026
Evidence¶
Mesenhöller J and Böhme K 2026¶
Mesenhöller J and Böhme K (2026). Empowering teachers to use AI for differentiation: changes in teachers’ acceptance of AI-based technologies following participation in a short professional development training session. Front. Educ. 11:1875856. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2026.1875856
q2 · i1 · design · r2
Paired-samples t-test on the SAELKIS PEOU subscale in the same pilot pre-post evaluation (N = 100). The article reports PEOU "increased significantly" with the printed statistics; pre-test PEOU was M = 2.85 (SD = .72), post-test M = 2.99 (SD = .58).
"PEOU also increased significantly, t(99) = −2.47, p = .015, mean difference = −0.13, 95% CI [−0.24, −0.03], d = −0.25, 95% CI [−0.45, −0.05]."
Discussion¶
Learner Variables¶
- Digital Literacy — outcome: instruction changes it
Related Claims¶
- Behavioural intention to use AI-based technologies does not change significantly following the INSIGHT training, despite increases in perceived usefulness and ease of use — related
- Participation in the short INSIGHT training session is associated with a significant pre-post increase in teachers’ perceived usefulness of AI-based technologies — related
- Teachers rate the INSIGHT training as highly helpful and relevant for lesson planning and instructional design across disciplines, school types, and grade levels — related
- Low- and intermediate-proficiency students report higher perceived usefulness, ease of use, and satisfaction for AI-assisted English tools than high-proficiency students — related
- Behavioural intention to use GenAI tools significantly predicts in-service teachers' self-reported pedagogical digital competence for curriculum planning — related
- AI training for pre-service primary teachers is predominantly short-term interventions embedded within existing courses rather than standalone AI courses — related
- Teachers rate AI-interaction training as useful and relevant and report positive adoption intentions — related
- Students’ prompt self-efficacy increased significantly after the scaffolded GenAI course (t = 3.729, p < .001) — related
- A professional development masterclass produces a 24% overall improvement in educators' AI utilization competence with large effect sizes — related
- Instructional approach, AI technology type, assessment instrument, educational level, and publication year do not significantly moderate AI literacy intervention effects — related
- Students' Domain interest increased largely across a short introductory teaching course (Cohen's d = 2.07). — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
insight-training-increases-perceived-ease-of-use-ai |
title |
Participation in the short INSIGHT training session is associated with a significant pre-post increase in teachers’ perceived ease of use of AI-based technologies |
description |
Participation in the short INSIGHT training session is associated with a significant pre-post increase in teachers’ perceived ease of use of AI-based technologies |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
weak |
newest_evidence |
2026 |
source_checked |
2026-10-20 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-11 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — mesenhöller-j-and-böhme-k-2026 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.