Instructional resources increased pupil concentration, enthusiasm and class participation in observed lessons¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · designr2·q2
Currency · newest study 2016 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? Across observed lessons, learners concentrated and their attention was captured and sustained by the resources. → Yeboah et al. 2016
q2 i? With resources, teachers developed discussions and almost all pupils in some classes raised their hands to answer questions, whereas previously it was difficult to get students to contribute. → Yeboah et al. 2016 (2)
Evidence¶
Yeboah et al. 2016¶
Rita Yeboah, Eric Appau Asante, Nana Afia Opoku-Asare. (2016). Teaching Interactive Art Lessons with Recycled Waste Materials as Instructional Resources. Journal of Education and Practice, Vol.7, No.14. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1102965
q2 · i? · design · r2
Researcher's participant observation across the lessons taught with the developed resources in the five schools. The researcher noticed that "the pupils and students concentrated on the lessons". Qualitative observation; no effect size printed.
"one key thing the researcher noticed from all the lessons in which the developed instructional resources were utilised was that, the pupils and students concentrated on the lessons as the resources were used to teach them"
Yeboah et al. 2016 (2)¶
Rita Yeboah, Eric Appau Asante, Nana Afia Opoku-Asare. (2016). Teaching Interactive Art Lessons with Recycled Waste Materials as Instructional Resources. Journal of Education and Practice, Vol.7, No.14. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1102965
q2 · i? · design · r2
Observation of resource-testing lessons; the article also cites an SHS teacher saying that without resources it was difficult to get students to contribute but with resources students asked many questions. Qualitative; no effect size printed.
"For example the testing of the teaching resources saw almost all p upils in some classes raising up their hands to answer quest ions during a lesson."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- IWB lessons produced greater engagement and enthusiasm but not better performance — related
- During classroom observation, think-talk-write students appeared more enthusiastic and confident in mathematics than expository-taught students — related
- Teaching Art lessons with instructional resources made lessons more practical and interactive and improved pupils' understanding and performance compared with lessons taught without resources — related
- Using instructional resources reduced the number of teaching periods needed for some Art lessons — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-03 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.