Claims

Instructional video materials significantly improve vocabulary learning of Iranian EFL learners compared with no video treatment

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q3
Currency · newest study 2016 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? Learners taught with instructional video materials scored significantly higher on a researcher-made vocabulary posttest than control learners taught by input-based instruction with mechanical drills. → Isazadeh 2016

Evidence

Isazadeh 2016

Isazadeh, P., Makui, S. M. Z., & Ansarian, L. (2016). Effect of Instructional vs. Authentic Video Materials on Introvert and Extrovert Iranian EFL Learners' Vocabulary Learning. International Journal of Education & Literacy Studies, 4(4). https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijels.v.4n.4p.1

q3 · i? · causal · r1

Independent samples t-test comparing the two instructional-video groups (combined) against the control group after 10 treatment sessions of 45 minutes each. The instructional-video groups scored "M = 20.72, SD = 3.411" versus the control's 17.40, t(48) = 3.988, p < .0005.

"the scores were significantly higher for experimental groups (combination of groups 3 and 4) ( M = 20.72, SD = 3.411) than for control group ( M = 17.40, SD = 2.778), t (48) = 3.988, p< .0005"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-03
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.