Claims

Authentic video materials significantly improve vocabulary learning of Iranian EFL learners compared with no video treatment

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q3
Currency · newest study 2016 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? Learners taught with authentic video materials scored significantly higher on the vocabulary posttest than the control group. → Isazadeh 2016

Evidence

Isazadeh 2016

Isazadeh, P., Makui, S. M. Z., & Ansarian, L. (2016). Effect of Instructional vs. Authentic Video Materials on Introvert and Extrovert Iranian EFL Learners' Vocabulary Learning. International Journal of Education & Literacy Studies, 4(4). https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijels.v.4n.4p.1

q3 · i? · causal · r1

Independent samples t-test comparing the two authentic-video groups (combined) with the control group on the researcher-made posttest. The authentic-video groups "outperformed the control group", t(48) = 3.553, p = .001; no effect size is printed.

"the experimental group (combination of group 1 and 2) ( M = 20.44, SD = 3.097) outperformed the control group ( M = 17.40, SD = 2.778), t (48) = 3.553, p = .001"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-03
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.