Claims

There is not enough evidence that e-learning interventions prevent neonatal resuscitation knowledge and performance decay in already-certified providers

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · review r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2022 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? A scoping review of five studies found e-learning interventions did not consistently enhance NRP knowledge and performance of already-certified providers. → Spénard Sarah 2022

Evidence

Spénard Sarah 2022

Spénard Sarah, Postlow Fabiana, Curran Vernon. (2022). E-learning use in the review of neonatal resuscitation program in physicians: a scoping review. Journal of Perinatology. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41372-022-01411-8

q2 · i? · review · r2

Scoping review following PRISMA guidelines searched five databases until June 2020; among 593 abstracts, 38 full texts were assessed and five studies were included. The review concludes there is "not enough evidence to conclude that e-learning interventions can prevent" NRP decay.

"There is not enough evidence to conclude that e-learning interventions can prevent neonatal resuscitation knowledge and performance decay in already-certified providers."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.