Medical students using an interactive whiteboard with a structured argument template show deeper collaborative and regulatory discourse and better patient-management outcomes than students using traditional whiteboards¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · reviewr2·q2
Currency · newest study 2012 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? The sample using interactive whiteboards had deeper collaborative and regulatory discourse and better learning outcomes in patient management than the sample using traditional whiteboards. → Carol K. K. Chan 2012
Evidence¶
Carol K. K. Chan 2012¶
Carol K. K. Chan. (2012). Co-regulation of learning in computer-supported collaborative learning environments: a discussion. Metacognition and Learning, 7, 63–73. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-012-9086-z
q2 · i? · review · r2
Study of two samples of medical students (14 and 11 students) working in groups of three on simulated medical decision-making events; the first sample used traditional whiteboards, the second an interactive whiteboard with a structured template for constructing and sharing arguments.
"The results suggest that the sample using interactive whiteboards had deeper collaborative and regulatory discourse and better learning outcomes in patient management."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Temporal phases of co-regulation matter: prolonged early planning to establish shared goals and common ground facilitates co-regulation and collaboration in later phases — a narrower finding that bears on this claim
- Virtual patients blended with traditional education improve knowledge more than traditional education alone (pooled SMD=0.73) — related
- Simulation Based Education With Deliberate Practice Improves Clinical Outcomes — a broader claim this one bears on
- Teacher discourse shifted toward creating new challenging situations (NI) and confirming repeats (R) in the interactive-whiteboard condition, versus providing requested information (IR) and clarification questions (Q) in the traditional-whiteboard condition — related
- Co-regulation led to shared understandings with effective patient management as a result (Lajoie and Lu) — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
interactive-whiteboard-supports-shared-regulation-medical-decision-making |
title |
Medical students using an interactive whiteboard with a structured argument template show deeper collaborative and regulatory discourse and better patient-management outcomes than students using traditional whiteboards |
description |
Medical students using an interactive whiteboard with a structured argument template show deeper collaborative and regulatory discourse and better patient-management outcomes than students using traditional whiteboards |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2012 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-19 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — carol-k-k-chan-2012 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.