Claims

Fourth-grade students using the interactive web-based workbook scored significantly higher on the academic success test than the control group at posttest

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2017 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Experiment group students achieved significantly higher academic success scores than control group students at posttest (U=25,5; p<0,05). → Özlem ULU KALIN 2017

Evidence

Özlem ULU KALIN 2017

Özlem ULU KALIN. (2017). Creating Interactive Student Workbook for Primary Education Social Studies Class and Researching Its Efficiency. Journal of Education and Practice, Vol.8, No.12. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1140630

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Semi-experimental pretest–posttest non-equalized control group study with 4th grade students (experiment N=21, control N=18) in Artvin; Mann Whitney U test on posttest scores found "acad emic success scores (U=25,5; p<0,05)" favoring the experiment group. No effect size is printed.

"At the end of the analysis, it is determined that t here is a meaningful difference between scores abou t attitude towards computer (U=104,0; p<0,05), attitu de towards social studies (U=50,5; p<0,05) and acad emic success scores (U=25,5; p<0,05)."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.