Claims

Interleaving disproportionately benefited students with below-average or up-to-0.96-SD-above-average midterm scores, though ceiling effects may contribute

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q2 · i2 medium
Currency · newest study 2026 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i2 The Homework Type × Midterm Score interaction was significant (β = −0.26, t(552) = −4.53, p < 0.001), indicating larger benefits for students with lower midterm scores. → Steve Bennoun 2026

Evidence

Steve Bennoun 2026

Steve Bennoun, Veronica X. Yan, & Alice Xu. (2026). Mixing problems increases performance of all students but especially of low-achieving ones in college calculus. npj Science of Learning. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41539-026-00450-6

q2 · i2 · causal · r2

Regression analysis of final exam z-scores (Model 2) including the Homework Type × Midterm Score interaction. The article reports β = −0.26, 95% CI = [−0.37, −0.15], t(552) = −4.53, p < 0.001, covering "83% of the students".

"interleaving was particularly beneficial for students with a midterm score either below average or up to 0.96 standard deviation above average (see Fig.3), representing 83% of the students, as evidenced by a significant Homework Type × Midterm Score interaction term ( β = −0.26, 95% CI = [ −0.37, −0.15], t(552) =−4.53, p < 0.001)."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-27
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.