Interview respondents identify collaborative relationships, trust in evidence and its users, clarity on research types, and supportive leadership as facilitators of evidence use¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · qualitative r? · q1
Currency · newest study 2019 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q1 i? Factors facilitating evidence use include collaborative relationships between evidence producers and decision-makers, trust in the evidence and in the decision-makers using it, clarity on how different research types can be used, and leadership that supports evidence use with staff buy-in. → Julieta Lugo-Gil 2019

Evidence¶

Julieta Lugo-Gil 2019¶

Julieta Lugo-Gil, Dana Jean-Baptiste, Livia Frasso Jaramillo. (2019). Use of Evidence to Drive Decision-Making in Government. Washington, DC: Mathematica Policy Research. https://www.mathematica.org/publications/use-of-evidence-to-drive-decision-making-in-government

q1 · i? · qualitative · r?

Phase 2 qualitative interviews with experts in evaluation, dissemination, and evidence use in government. Respondents pointed to facilitators including "building trust in the evidence that researchers produce" and "having leadership that supports and promotes the use of evidence and buy-in from the organization's staff." No effect sizes are reported.

"establishing collaborative relationships between evidence producers and decision-makers, building trust in the evidence that researchers produce and in the decision-makers that use the evidence within the government, improving clarity on how different types of research and their findings can be used in decision-making"

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• Subject matter interviews reveal barriers to evidence use in government: untimely evidence, research not geared to decision-makers, limited understanding of evidence, and organizational influences — related
• A literature review identifies misalignment between conducted research and needed evidence, contextual factors, and rarely used bridging frameworks as challenges to evidence use in policy decisions — related
• Interviewees identified leadership prioritization, staff buy-in, and investments in staffing, training, partnerships, and funding as facilitators of trauma-engaged implementation — related
• Supporting user interaction and control in the indicator implementation process positively affects transparency, trust, satisfaction, and acceptance in LA — related
• Governance structures that exclude faculty and support staff responsible for implementation produce policies that do not stick — related
• Eight enabling factors support relationship-centered school transformation in comprehensive high school settings — related
• Problematic one-way links between production and consumption processes impede the technology's circulation, with only one manufacturer responding to users — related