Interviews reveal ESL learners valued ASR for bypassing orthography and grammar concerns, pronunciation practice, self-efficacy, and user-friendly voice commands¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · qualitativer1·q2
Currency · newest study 2021 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? Qualitative analysis of semi-structured interviews identified positive perceptions including ease of producing texts without worrying about orthography and grammar, opportunities to improve pronunciation and self-efficacy when speaking, and user-friendly voice commands. → Johnson 2021
Evidence¶
Johnson 2021¶
Johnson, C., & Cardoso, W. (2021). Speaking to write: examining language learners’ acceptance of automatic speech recognition as a writing tool. In N. Zoghlami et al. (Eds), CALL and professionalisation: short papers from EUROCALL 2021 (pp. 167-171). Research-publishing.net. https://doi.org/10.14705/rpnet.2021.54.1327
q2 · i? · qualitative · r1
Semi-structured interviews with the 17 participants were coded for positive, negative, neutral, or mixed perceptions (Saldaña, 2009). The quoted sentence lists the appreciated affordances participants named.
"Interviews revealed that participants appreciated the ease of producing texts without having to worry about orthography and grammar, the possibility to improve their pronunciation and self-efficacy when speaking, and the user-friendly voice commands."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Adult ESL learners report above-neutral perceptions of ASR as a writing tool on usefulness, ease of use, and intention to use — related
- Students responded positively to ASR pronunciation training and the Rainbow passage, but were mixed on technical aspects of recording and voice typing — related
- Some ESL learners felt their English was not high enough to use ASR because their speech was not always intelligible to it, although overall perceived usefulness was positive — related
- Chinese EFL learners' positive perceptions of GenAI-based pronunciation feedback are positively associated with their English pronunciation self-efficacy — related
- Through Chapelle's CALL evaluation criteria, participants experienced ASR writing as useful, authentic, meaning-focused, and matched to their proficiency level — related
- Twelve semi-structured interviews with university students and lecturers identified twelve knowledge-based design requirements for tutoring GSRs across three knowledge types — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
interviews-asr-ease-and-speaking-benefits |
title |
Interviews reveal ESL learners valued ASR for bypassing orthography and grammar concerns, pronunciation practice, self-efficacy, and user-friendly voice commands |
description |
Interviews reveal ESL learners valued ASR for bypassing orthography and grammar concerns, pronunciation practice, self-efficacy, and user-friendly voice commands |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
weak |
newest_evidence |
2021 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-07 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — johnson-2021 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.