Most ISBTT programs are one-time events involving two or three professions, with debriefing nearly universal and psychological safety rarely addressed¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · review r3 · q2
Currency · newest study 2025 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q2 i? 27 of 58 articles (46.5%) reported programs with participants from 2 professions, and 40 (70%) described one-time training. → Bochatay N 2025 q2 i? Debriefing was described in 53 articles (91.4%), but only 7 (12.1%) referenced psychological safety in the prebriefing. → Bochatay N 2025 (2)

Evidence¶

Bochatay N 2025¶

Bochatay N, Ju M, O'Brien BC, van Schaik SM. (2025). A Scoping Review of Interprofessional Simulation-Based Team Training Programs. Simulation in Healthcare. https://doi.org/10.1097/SIH.0000000000000792

q2 · i? · review · r3

The review's charting of design features (Table 2) across 58 articles; it also reports "The majority of articles described 1-time training events" (42 articles, 72.4%).

"A large proportion of articles (27, 46.5%) reported on programs with participants from 2 professions, most frequently medicine and nursing together while other combinations, for example, nursing and dentistry, were less common."

Bochatay N 2025 (2)¶

Bochatay N, Ju M, O'Brien BC, van Schaik SM. (2025). A Scoping Review of Interprofessional Simulation-Based Team Training Programs. Simulation in Healthcare. https://doi.org/10.1097/SIH.0000000000000792

q2 · i? · review · r3

The review's summary of session format; separately it reports debriefing described in 53 (91.4%) articles and psychological safety addressed in only 7 (12.1%).

"Prebriefings were described in the majority of articles (36, 62%) and focused on 1 or several of the following topics: goals for the session, collaborative practice, clinical aspects of the scenario, and orientation to the simulation setting and equipment."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• Assessed collaborative behaviors in ISBTT rarely cover all four IPEC domains, with values and ethics almost never assessed — related
• Most ISBTT studies report improvement in collaborative behaviors immediately after training, but longer-term and clinical-setting outcomes are rarely measured — related
• Only a small minority of ISBTT studies used the IPEC competencies to design programs or assess participants — related
• Most published ISBTT programs are grounded in crisis resource management and related frameworks rather than interprofessional education frameworks — related