Claims

Assessed collaborative behaviors in ISBTT rarely cover all four IPEC domains, with values and ethics almost never assessed

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · review r3 · q2
Currency · newest study 2025 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Only 3 of 58 articles (5.2%) assessed all four IPEC competencies; values and ethics for interprofessional collaboration were assessed in only 4 articles (6.9%). → Bochatay N 2025 q2 i? All but one article assessed teamwork and 39 (67.2%) assessed communication, but most instruments did not specifically focus on communication between members from different professions. → Bochatay N 2025 (2)

Evidence

Bochatay N 2025

Bochatay N, Ju M, O'Brien BC, van Schaik SM. (2025). A Scoping Review of Interprofessional Simulation-Based Team Training Programs. Simulation in Healthcare. https://doi.org/10.1097/SIH.0000000000000792

q2 · i? · review · r3

The review's mapping of assessed behaviors onto IPEC domains across 58 articles; it further reports "values and ethics for interprofessional collaboration were only assessed in 4 (6.9%)."

"In mapping the assessed collaborative behaviors to IPEC domains, we found that 19 (32.8%) articles reported assessment of 1 competency; 15 (25.9%) assessed 2 competencies; 21 (36.2%) assessed 3 competencies; and 3 (5.2%) articles assessed all 4 competencies."

Bochatay N 2025 (2)

Bochatay N, Ju M, O'Brien BC, van Schaik SM. (2025). A Scoping Review of Interprofessional Simulation-Based Team Training Programs. Simulation in Healthcare. https://doi.org/10.1097/SIH.0000000000000792

q2 · i? · review · r3

The review reports that teamwork and communication dominated assessment, consistent with CRM reliance, while interprofessional-specific communication was rarely targeted.

"All but one article described assessment tools that focused on teamwork, and 39 (67.2%) assessed communication, consistent with reliance on CRM and related frameworks by the majority of programs."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.