Most published ISBTT programs are grounded in crisis resource management and related frameworks rather than interprofessional education frameworks¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · review r3 · q2
Currency · newest study 2025 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q2 i? Of 58 included articles, 18 (31%) referenced CRM and 14 (24.1%) referenced TeamSTEPPS, while only 12 (20.6%) framed ISBTT in the context of IPE. → Bochatay N 2025

Evidence¶

Bochatay N 2025¶

Bochatay N, Ju M, O'Brien BC, van Schaik SM. (2025). A Scoping Review of Interprofessional Simulation-Based Team Training Programs. Simulation in Healthcare. https://doi.org/10.1097/SIH.0000000000000792

q2 · i? · review · r3

Scoping review of 58 articles on ISBTT programs; the review's charting of theoretical frameworks found CRM and TeamSTEPPS most cited, with "Fifteen articles (25.9%) did not refer to any framework." Only 12 articles framed ISBTT as IPE.

"They often approached ISBTT from a patient safety perspective and typically implicitly or explicitly referred to conceptual frameworks such as CRM (18 articles, 31%) and TeamSTEPPS (14 articles, 24.1%) that guided the content of the reported ISBTT program."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• Only a small minority of ISBTT studies used the IPEC competencies to design programs or assess participants — related
• Most ISBTT programs are one-time events involving two or three professions, with debriefing nearly universal and psychological safety rarely addressed — related
• Assessed collaborative behaviors in ISBTT rarely cover all four IPEC domains, with values and ethics almost never assessed — related