Students taught isometric and orthographic projection with interactive whiteboard significantly outperformed chalkboard-taught students on psychomotor skills achievement¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2014 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q2 i? After controlling for pretest scores, students taught with IWB achieved significantly higher posttest scores than students taught with chalkboard. → Gambari 2014

Evidence¶

Gambari 2014¶

Gambari, I. A., Balogun, S. A., & Alfa, A. S. (2014). Efficacy of Interactive Whiteboard on Psychomotor Skills Achievement of Students in Isometric and Orthographic Projection. Contemporary Educational Technology, 5(4), 316-330. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1105500

q2 · i? · causal · r2

ANCOVA on posttest scores of 94 JSS-1 students in a quasi-experimental pretest-posttest non-equivalent group design, with pretest as covariate. The treatment main effect was significant, "F (1, 97) = 74.640, p < .05".

"Table 3 shows that an F (1, 97) = 74.640, p < .05 for the main effect (treatment) was significant, this indicates that the method of instruction produced a significant effect on the achievement scores of students when covariate effect (pre -test) was controlled."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• No significant gender difference in achievement among students taught with interactive whiteboard — related
• Junior secondary students taught Technical Drawing with PowerPoint presentation achieved significantly higher posttest scores than students taught with chalkboard instruction — related
• The Basic Technology Achievement Test (BTAT) showed reliability coefficients of 0.84 (KR-21) and 0.88 (KR-20) — related