IY TCM intervention teachers were more likely to rate parents in the most adaptive involvement profiles at follow-up compared to control teachers¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2017 · checked against its sources 2026-11-01 (automated, 1 of 1 entry) · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q3 i? Parents of intervention teachers were more likely to be in the High Contact/High Comfort class at follow-up versus the Low Contact/Low Comfort (OR: 4.55) and Low Contact/Medium Comfort (OR: 5.30) classes. → Herman and Reinke 2017 q3 i? Intervention teachers were also more likely to rate parents in the Low Contact/High Comfort class compared to the Low Contact/Low Comfort (OR: 2.95) and Low Contact/Medium Comfort (OR: 3.43) classes. → Herman and Reinke 2017

Evidence¶

Herman and Reinke 2017¶

Herman, K. C., & Reinke, W. M. (2017). Improving Teacher Perceptions of Parent Involvement Patterns: Findings From a Group Randomized Trial. School Psychology Quarterly, 32(1), 89-104. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/spq0000169

q3 · i? · causal · r2

Latent transition analysis with treatment condition as covariate in a group randomized trial of 105 classrooms (1818 students), controlling for student sex, race, and lunch status. The article reports "OR: 4.55; 1.09 –19.03" and "OR : 5.30; 1.21–22.36" for the High Contact/High Comfort comparisons.

"Parents of intervention teachers were more likely to be in the High Contact/High Comfort class at follow-up versus the Low Contact/Low Contact [sic; the article's Low Contact/Low Comfort class] (OR: 4.55; 1.09 –19.03) and Low Contact/ Medium Comfort classes ( OR : 5.30; 1.21–22.36)."

Discussion¶

Learner Variables¶

• Home Learning Environment — outcome: instruction changes it

Related Claims¶

• Four parent involvement profiles emerged, and the Low Contact/Low Comfort profile had the worst academic and behavioral correlates — related
• Progression to more adaptive involvement profiles was more likely in the intervention group and digression more likely in the control group — possibly the same claim (merge candidate)
• The Low Contact/Low Comfort profile was more likely to contain parents of FRL and African American students — related
• Low contact alone was not associated with adverse student outcomes; the Low Contact/High Comfort profile had the most favorable correlates — related
• IY TCM shows no significant effects on disruptive behavior or concentration problems — related
• Teacher-to-parent communication did not affect teachers' assessments of student effort or in-class behavior — related