Enterprising-type items in JEU SERAI did not work correctly, attributed to panel underrepresentation and weak action-verb rationalization¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · design r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2015 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person · overdue for a recheck since 2018: tool and model accuracy changes quickly

Subclaims¶

q2 i? Mini game ranking correlations were significant except for the Enterprising mini game Sand and Sweat, and most Enterprising elements did not work correctly. → Guardiola 2015

Evidence¶

Guardiola 2015¶

Guardiola, E., & Natkin, S. (2015). A Game Design Methodology for Generating a Psychological Profile of Players. In Serious Games Analytics, Methodologies for Performance Measurement, Assessment, and Improvement. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05834-4_16

q2 · i? · design · r2

Correlation analysis of mini game ranking items against RIASEC questionnaire dimensions (Table 6) in the JEU SERAI test found coefficients significant except for "Sand and Sweat", with most Enterprising elements failing across the whole analysis.

"Correlation coefficients are significant except for “Sand and Sweat”. In fact, during the whole analysis, most of the elements addressed to the Enterprising RIASEC type do not work correctly."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• In JEU SERAI, questionnaire-like in-game items (diary ordering, mini game ranking, narrative questionnaires) correlated best with RIASEC questionnaire results, while other item types correlated poorly — related
• The replay item in JEU SERAI indicated Realistic type affiliation regardless of the anticipated RIASEC type of the mini game replayed — related