Jigsaw IV instruction produced a statistically significant pre-to-post achievement gain in the experiment group¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2015 · checked against its sources 2026-11-01 (automated, 1 of 1 entry) · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q2 i? The experiment group taught with Jigsaw IV showed a statistically significant increase from pre-test (mean 5.45) to post-test (mean 7.12). → Turkmen 2015

Evidence¶

Turkmen 2015¶

Turkmen, H. & Buyukaltay, D. (2015). Which one is better? Jigsaw II versus Jigsaw IV on the subject of the building blocks of matter and atom. Journal of Education in Science, Environment and Health (JESEH), 1(2), 88-94. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1105340

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Dependent-group t-test on the 24-student experiment group taught 'Atoms - the Basic Unit of Matter' with Jigsaw IV; pre-test mean 5.45 (SD 2.39), post-test mean 7.12 (SD 2.36), t = -3.646, p = 0.001. The article reports "This difference occurred in favor of the post -test".

"A statistically significance difference at level of 0.05 was found in the dependent group t-test carried out for achievement pre-test and post-test of the experiment group. This difference occurred in favor of the post -test."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• Jigsaw II instruction produced a statistically significant pre-to-post achievement gain in the control group — related
• No statistically significant post-test difference was found between the Jigsaw IV and Jigsaw II groups — related
• Self-regulated jigsaw IV produced significantly higher achievement gain scores than traditional teaching in a university EFL grammar unit — related