Claims

Vocational students taught with JiTT through web technologies showed significantly more positive attitudes toward English learning than control students

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q3
Currency · newest study 2016 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? Attitudes toward English learning differed significantly between the experimental and control groups (t2 = 2.45, p-value = .019). → Rewadee Chantoem & Saowalak Rattanavich 2016

Evidence

Rewadee Chantoem & Saowalak Rattanavich 2016

Rewadee Chantoem & Saowalak Rattanavich. (2016). Just-In-Time Teaching Techniques through Web Technologies for Vocational Students' Reading and Writing Abilities. English Language Teaching, 9(1). http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/elt.v9n1p65

q3 · i? · causal · r1

Attitudes measured with a five-choice Likert questionnaire (reliability 0.99) in the randomized pretest-posttest experiment. The article reports "a significant difference in attitudes towards English learning" between groups, with post-test means 3.91 (JiTT) vs 3.58 (control).

"there was a significant difference in attitudes towards English learning at the .01 confidence level between the experimental and control groups ( t2 = 2.45**, p-value = .019)"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.