Claims

Vocational students taught with JiTT through web technologies showed significantly higher writing ability than conventionally taught students at the .01 level

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q3
Currency · newest study 2016 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? The experimental group's writing ability was significantly higher than the control group's after ten weeks of JiTT through web technologies (t2 = 2.836, p = .007). → Rewadee Chantoem & Saowalak Rattanavich 2016

Evidence

Rewadee Chantoem & Saowalak Rattanavich 2016

Rewadee Chantoem & Saowalak Rattanavich. (2016). Just-In-Time Teaching Techniques through Web Technologies for Vocational Students' Reading and Writing Abilities. English Language Teaching, 9(1). http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/elt.v9n1p65

q3 · i? · causal · r1

Randomized true control-group pretest-posttest experiment with 40 Thai vocational students in two classes of 20, taught over ten weeks. Between-groups t-test showed "a significant difference in writing ability at the .01 level" favoring the JiTT group (post-test means 14.9 vs 12.7).

"there was a significant difference in writing ability at the .01 level between the experimental and control groups ( t2 = 2.836**, p-value = .007 )"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.