Reading ability differed significantly between the JiTT and control groups at the .05 level as reported¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q3
Currency · newest study 2016 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q3 i? Reading ability was reported as significantly different between groups at the .05 level (t2 = 1.597, p-value = .119). → Rewadee Chantoem & Saowalak Rattanavich 2016

Evidence¶

Rewadee Chantoem & Saowalak Rattanavich 2016¶

Rewadee Chantoem & Saowalak Rattanavich. (2016). Just-In-Time Teaching Techniques through Web Technologies for Vocational Students' Reading and Writing Abilities. English Language Teaching, 9(1). http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/elt.v9n1p65

q3 · i? · causal · r1

Between-groups comparison in the same randomized pretest-posttest experiment. The article reports reading "significantly different at the .05 level" with t2 = 1.597 and p-value = .119; the printed p-value exceeds .05, an inconsistency in the article's own reporting.

"but reading ability was significantly different at the .05 level ( t2 = 1.597*, p-value = .119)"

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• Urban-school students significantly outperformed rural-school students in reading comprehension between experimental and control groups — related
• Vocational students taught with JiTT through web technologies showed significantly higher writing ability than conventionally taught students at the .01 level — related