Making JOLs with complete words did not significantly enhance interim recall of new List-5 material compared to restudy¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causalr2·q3
Currency · newest study 2022 · checked against its sources 2026-10-20 (automated, 1 of 1 entry) · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i? JOLs with complete words did not significantly improve interim List-5 recall relative to restudy (d = 0.25, p = .264); equivalence was not tested. → Veit Kubik 2022
Evidence¶
Veit Kubik 2022¶
Veit Kubik, Kenneth Koslowski, Torsten Schubert, Alp Aslan. (2022). Metacognitive judgments can potentiate new learning: The role of covert retrieval. Metacognition and Learning (2022) 17:1057–1077. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-022-09307-w
q3 · i? · causal · r2
Same between-subjects experiment (N = 161); the planned contrast for the JOLs-with-complete-words group versus restudy on interim List-5 recall was nonsignificant: "t(79) = 1.12, p = .264, d = 0.25". The small, nonsignificant d = 0.25 (95% CI −0.19 to 0.70) neither shows a benefit nor establishes its absence; equivalence was not tested, so impact is left uncoded (i?).
"but that making JOLs with complete words was not, t(79) = 1.12, p = .264, d = 0.25, 95% CI [-0.19, 0.70]"
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- On the final cumulative test, JOLs with word stems and retrieval practice improve List-5 recall over restudy, while restudy shows a List-1 advantage — related
- Overt retrieval practice enhances interim recall of new List-5 material compared to restudy, and does not differ from JOLs with word stems — related
- Making JOLs with word stems enhances interim recall of new List-5 material compared to restudy — related
- JOLs with word stems and retrieval practice reduce prior-list intrusions on the List-5 test, whereas JOLs with complete words do not — related
- JOL magnitudes decline across successive lists in both JOL groups, reflecting learners' belief that recall decreases with continued new learning — related
- Making JOLs is not a neutral act: metacognitive ratings reactively affect subsequent learning, so experiments need judgment-free conditions — a broader claim this one bears on
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
jol-complete-words-no-list5-interim-benefit |
title |
Making JOLs with complete words did not significantly enhance interim recall of new List-5 material compared to restudy |
description |
Making JOLs with complete words did not significantly enhance interim recall of new List-5 material compared to restudy |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2022 |
source_checked |
2026-10-20 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-18 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — veit-kubik-2022 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.