Overt retrieval practice enhances interim recall of new List-5 material compared to restudy, and does not differ from JOLs with word stems¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · causal r3 · q3 · i2 medium
Currency · newest study 2022 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q3 i2 Retrieval practice after Lists 1–4 improved interim List-5 recall relative to restudy (d = 0.59). → Veit Kubik 2022 q3 i? Overt retrieval practice and JOLs with word stems did not significantly differ in interim List-5 recall (d = 0.08, p = .725). → Veit Kubik 2022 (2)

Evidence¶

Veit Kubik 2022¶

Veit Kubik, Kenneth Koslowski, Torsten Schubert, Alp Aslan. (2022). Metacognitive judgments can potentiate new learning: The role of covert retrieval. Metacognition and Learning (2022) 17:1057–1077. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-022-09307-w

q3 · i2 · causal · r3

Planned contrast in the same N = 161 multiple-list experiment: the retrieval group "trumped restudy" on interim List-5 free recall, t(78) = 2.59, p = .006, d = 0.59 (one-tailed).

"In addition, the data showed that practicing retrieval, t(78) = 2.59, p = .006, d = 0.59, 95% CI [0.20, ∞] (one-tailed), trumped restudy."

Veit Kubik 2022 (2)¶

Veit Kubik, Kenneth Koslowski, Torsten Schubert, Alp Aslan. (2022). Metacognitive judgments can potentiate new learning: The role of covert retrieval. Metacognition and Learning (2022) 17:1057–1077. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-022-09307-w

q3 · i? · causal · r3

Planned contrast comparing overt retrieval practice with JOLs with word stems on interim List-5 recall in the same experiment: "both practice types did not significantly differ, t(78) = 0.353, p = .725, d = 0.08".

"A planned contrast revealed that both practice types did not significantly differ, t(78) = 0.353, p = .725, d = 0.08, 95% CI [-0.36, 0.52]."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• On the final cumulative test, JOLs with word stems and retrieval practice improve List-5 recall over restudy, while restudy shows a List-1 advantage — related
• Making JOLs with complete words did not significantly enhance interim recall of new List-5 material compared to restudy — related
• JOL magnitudes decline across successive lists in both JOL groups, reflecting learners' belief that recall decreases with continued new learning — related
• Making JOLs is not a neutral act: metacognitive ratings reactively affect subsequent learning, so experiments need judgment-free conditions — a broader claim this one bears on
• Making JOLs with word stems enhances interim recall of new List-5 material compared to restudy — related
• Retrieval practice enhances final-test recollection of contextual details and speeds final retrieval, as shown by list discrimination, response time, and cumulative recall measures — a broader claim this one bears on
• JOLs with word stems and retrieval practice reduce prior-list intrusions on the List-5 test, whereas JOLs with complete words do not — related
• Both overt and covert retrieval practice outperform restudy when practice and test match (the testing effect) — related