Making JOLs with word stems enhances interim recall of new List-5 material compared to restudy¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causalr3·q3·i2medium
Currency · newest study 2022 · checked against its sources 2026-10-20 (automated, 1 of 1 entry) · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i2 Making JOLs with word stems after Lists 1–4 improved interim free recall of criterial List 5 relative to restudy (d = 0.51). → Veit Kubik 2022
Evidence¶
Veit Kubik 2022¶
Veit Kubik, Kenneth Koslowski, Torsten Schubert, Alp Aslan. (2022). Metacognitive judgments can potentiate new learning: The role of covert retrieval. Metacognition and Learning (2022) 17:1057–1077. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-022-09307-w
q3 · i2 · causal · r3
Controlled lab experiment in a multiple-list paradigm with N = 161 undergraduates randomly assigned to four practice-type groups; planned contrast on interim List-5 free recall found word-stem JOLs "superior to restudy, t(78) = 2.24, p = .014, d = 0.51".
"Planned contrast analyses revealed that making JOLs with word stems was superior to restudy, t(78) = 2.24, p = .014, d = 0.51, 95% CI [0.13, ∞] (one-tailed)"
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- On the final cumulative test, JOLs with word stems and retrieval practice improve List-5 recall over restudy, while restudy shows a List-1 advantage — related
- Making JOLs with complete words did not significantly enhance interim recall of new List-5 material compared to restudy — related
- JOL magnitudes decline across successive lists in both JOL groups, reflecting learners' belief that recall decreases with continued new learning — related
- Making JOLs is not a neutral act: metacognitive ratings reactively affect subsequent learning, so experiments need judgment-free conditions — a broader claim this one bears on
- Overt retrieval practice enhances interim recall of new List-5 material compared to restudy, and does not differ from JOLs with word stems — related
- JOLs with word stems and retrieval practice reduce prior-list intrusions on the List-5 test, whereas JOLs with complete words do not — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
jol-word-stems-enhance-list5-interim-recall |
title |
Making JOLs with word stems enhances interim recall of new List-5 material compared to restudy |
description |
Making JOLs with word stems enhances interim recall of new List-5 material compared to restudy |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2022 |
source_checked |
2026-10-20 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-18 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — veit-kubik-2022 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.