JOS discrimination decreased across blocks as anagram presentation duration was reduced, driven by different mechanisms for AS versus S JOSs¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q3 · i3 large
Currency · newest study 2023 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q3 i3 The discrimination × block interaction was significant, with hits decreasing and false alarms increasing as anagram duration was halved across blocks. → Burton 2023

Evidence¶

Burton 2023¶

Burton, O. R., Bodner, G. E., Williamson, P., & Arnold, M. M. (2023). How accurate and predictive are judgments of solvability? Explorations in a two-phase anagram solving paradigm. Metacognition and Learning, 18, 1–35. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-022-09313-y

q3 · i3 · causal · r2

Experiment 1 linear contrast ANOVAs on AS + S JOSs: block × discrimination interaction F = 51.01, p < .001, η²p = .34. "Hits decreased about .04 per block as anagram duration was halved, whereas false alarms increased about .04 per block".

"Hits decreased about .04 per block as anagram duration was halved, whereas false alarms increased about .04 per block (both linear effects were significant)."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• Training with longer-duration anagrams improved AS JOS discrimination in blocks 1–3 but not S JOS discrimination — related
• S JOSs were discriminating but not predictive of later solving success in Experiments 1 and 2 — related
• Training improved the predictiveness of AS and NS JOSs but not S JOSs, indicating training increased solving during the JOS task rather than JOS predictiveness — related
• AS and NS JOSs reliably predicted later solving outcomes, with AS JOSs predicting success and NS JOSs predicting failure — related