Training with longer-duration anagrams improved AS JOS discrimination in blocks 1–3 but not S JOS discrimination¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q3 · i2 medium
Currency · newest study 2023 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q3 i2 The three-way interaction of discrimination × block × group was significant for AS JOSs but not for S JOSs in blocks 1–3. → Burton 2023

Evidence¶

Burton 2023¶

Burton, O. R., Bodner, G. E., Williamson, P., & Arnold, M. M. (2023). How accurate and predictive are judgments of solvability? Explorations in a two-phase anagram solving paradigm. Metacognition and Learning, 18, 1–35. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-022-09313-y

q3 · i2 · causal · r2

Experiment 2 (182 participants, 91 per group) mixed-factor ANOVA comparing training (16/8/4 s) versus no-training (2 s) groups in blocks 1–3. AS JOS three-way interaction η²p = .04; S JOS three-way interaction not significant (η²p = .01). "longer-duration anagrams in the training group improved AS JOS discrimination".

"For AS JOSs, this interaction was significant, indicating that longer-duration anagrams in the training group improved AS JOS discrimination. However, the three-way interaction was not significant for S JOSs"

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• JOS discrimination decreased across blocks as anagram presentation duration was reduced, driven by different mechanisms for AS versus S JOSs — related
• Training improved the predictiveness of AS and NS JOSs but not S JOSs, indicating training increased solving during the JOS task rather than JOS predictiveness — related
• S JOSs were discriminating but not predictive of later solving success in Experiments 1 and 2 — related
• AS and NS JOSs reliably predicted later solving outcomes, with AS JOSs predicting success and NS JOSs predicting failure — related
• Solvable judgments of solvability discriminate solvable from unsolvable anagrams even after excluding already-solved judgments — related