Experimental-group students most frequently named Kahoot as what helped them prepare for the exam¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2017 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q2 i? In survey responses, the experimental group mentioned Kahoot 17 times for exam preparation, while the control group most often named PowerPoint, notes, and the study guide. → Iwamoto 2017

Evidence¶

Iwamoto 2017¶

Iwamoto, D. H., Hargis, J., Taitano, E. J., & Vuong, K. (2017). Analyzing the efficacy of the testing effect using Kahoot on student performance. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 18(2). https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1145220

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Thematic and word-frequency analysis of questionnaire responses using an online text analyzer. The experimental group (n=24) mentioned Kahoot 17 times; the control group (n=23) named PowerPoint 11 times, notes 9, and study guide 8.

"In response to the first question, “What helped yo u in class prepare for the exam,” participants in the control group (n=23) mentioned “PowerPoint” 11 times followed by “notes” (9) and “study guide” (8). Participants in the experimental group (n=24) mentioned “Kahoot™” 17 times"

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• The authors observed higher engagement, enthusiasm, and peer study-group use in the Kahoot group than in the control group — related
• Students in the experimental group reported that Kahoot quizzes helped, were fun, and left them feeling positive about exam preparation — possibly the same claim (merge candidate)
• Students rated the game positively, most often citing fun/interactive features, visuals, and new information learned — related