The authors observed higher engagement, enthusiasm, and peer study-group use in the Kahoot group than in the control group¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causalr1·q1
Currency · newest study 2017 · checked against its sources 2026-11-01 (automated, 1 of 1 entry) · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q1 i? The researcher observed more enthusiasm, class dialogue, and peer study-group collaboration in the experimental group, which was not observed in the control group. → Iwamoto 2017
Evidence¶
Iwamoto 2017¶
Iwamoto, D. H., Hargis, J., Taitano, E. J., & Vuong, K. (2017). Analyzing the efficacy of the testing effect using Kahoot on student performance. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 18(2). https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1145220
q1 · i? · causal · r1
Authors' observational interpretation from the discussion section, not a tested result: energy, engagement, and class dialogue were observed to be higher in the experimental group, alongside increased use of peer study groups.
"This level of enthusiasm was not observed in the control group. The energy level, engagement, and even relevant class dialogue was observed to be higher in the experimental group. An interesting side effect to this was an increase use of peer study groups."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- During classroom observation, think-talk-write students appeared more enthusiastic and confident in mathematics than expository-taught students — related
- In a Thai university EFL course, students revising with Kahoot achieved higher adjusted post-test grammar and vocabulary scores than students revising with paper quizzes — related
- Students taught with Kahoot reported significantly higher learning motivation than students taught with paper quizzes — related
- Experimental-group students most frequently named Kahoot as what helped them prepare for the exam — related
- A course section that reviewed with Kahoot no-stakes quizzes differed significantly in high-stakes multiple-choice exam scores from a section that reviewed with a study guide and lecture, a difference the authors report as improvement without printing group means — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.