Kansas schools moved from exploration to initial implementation of MTSS between 2012 and 2014, while full implementation stayed near 8%¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · associationalr1·q2
Currency · newest study 2015 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? Among survey respondents, the share of schools at the initial implementation stage rose from 32.8% in 2012 to 72.4% in 2014, while the full implementation share remained stable at 8.3% in 2014. → Kristin Reedy 2015
q2 i? Movement between stages is not uniformly forward: of schools at full implementation in 2013 that responded in both years, 62.2% scored at initial implementation in 2014. → Kristin Reedy 2015 (2)
Evidence¶
Kristin Reedy 2015¶
Kristin Reedy, Ed.D., and Natalie Lacireno-Paquet, Ph.D. (2015). Implementation and Outcomes of Kansas Multi-Tier System of Supports: Final Evaluation Report—2014. WestEd. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED559729
q2 · i? · design · r3
Analysis of the annual Kansas MTSS School Survey of Effective Instructional Practices (555 respondents in 2014), classifying schools into Fixsen-based implementation stages. The report prints the year as "2103" in this sentence; Table 1 shows 67.9% for 2013.
"the percentage of schools scoring in the initial implementation stage increased significantly, from 32.8% in 2012, to 67.9% in 2103, to 72.4% in 2014"
Kristin Reedy 2015 (2)¶
Kristin Reedy, Ed.D., and Natalie Lacireno-Paquet, Ph.D. (2015). Implementation and Outcomes of Kansas Multi-Tier System of Supports: Final Evaluation Report—2014. WestEd. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED559729
q2 · i? · associational · r1
Longitudinal analysis of the 292 schools responding to the survey in both 2013 and 2014 (Table 2). The report attributes backward movement partly to stringent full-implementation scoring criteria, where one or two item responses can shift a school's stage.
"Of those schools at full implementation in 2013, 37.8% remained at full implementation and 62.2% scored at the initial implementation stage."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Nearly half of Kansas public schools and two-thirds of districts have participated in formal MTSS training, with no state mandate — related
- Schools with formal fidelity-monitoring processes achieved stronger MTSS implementation, and full implementers share leadership, professional development, and integration characteristics — related
- Nearly half of Kansas public schools and two-thirds of districts have participated in formal MTSS training — related
- Kansas schools are progressing from exploration to more advanced MTSS implementation stages over time — a broader claim this one bears on
- Most implementing schools report MTSS positively affecting benchmark scores, state assessment proficiency, discipline referrals, and special education referrals — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
kansas-mtss-schools-advance-implementation-stages |
title |
Kansas schools moved from exploration to initial implementation of MTSS between 2012 and 2014, while full implementation stayed near 8% |
description |
Kansas schools moved from exploration to initial implementation of MTSS between 2012 and 2014, while full implementation stayed near 8% |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2015 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-09 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
2 — kristin-reedy-2015, kristin-reedy-2015-2 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.