Claims

Schools with formal fidelity-monitoring processes achieved stronger MTSS implementation, and full implementers share leadership, professional development, and integration characteristics

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · associational r1–r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2015 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Schools that established formal processes for monitoring fidelity of implementation seemed to achieve stronger or higher levels of implementation. → Kristin Reedy 2015 q2 i? Full-implementation schools are more likely than lower-stage schools to have participated in formal training, describe MTSS as district-led, operate leadership teams and PLCs, share vision and common language, and use screening and progress-monitoring data for instructional decisions. → Kristin Reedy 2015 (2)

Evidence

Kristin Reedy 2015

Kristin Reedy, Ed.D., and Natalie Lacireno-Paquet, Ph.D. (2015). Implementation and Outcomes of Kansas Multi-Tier System of Supports: Final Evaluation Report—2014. WestEd. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED559729

q2 · i? · associational · r1

Case study and survey data from the evaluation; fidelity was determined through school self-report on the annual survey and evaluator observation during site visits to case study schools. The finding is hedged with "seemed to" in the source.

"schools that established formal processes for monitoring fidelity of implementation seemed to achieve stronger or higher levels of implementation"

Kristin Reedy 2015 (2)

Kristin Reedy, Ed.D., and Natalie Lacireno-Paquet, Ph.D. (2015). Implementation and Outcomes of Kansas Multi-Tier System of Supports: Final Evaluation Report—2014. WestEd. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED559729

q2 · i? · associational · r2

Analysis of 2014 school survey data comparing schools at the full implementation stage with lower stages, presented in Appendix C charts and consistent across 2013 and 2014 data; the quoted item is one of the listed differentiating characteristics.

"Have shared vision and common language across staff about MTSS."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id kansas-mtss-fidelity-monitoring-stronger-implementation
title Schools with formal fidelity-monitoring processes achieved stronger MTSS implementation, and full implementers share leadership, professional development, and integration characteristics
description Schools with formal fidelity-monitoring processes achieved stronger MTSS implementation, and full implementers share leadership, professional development, and integration characteristics
status review
evidence_strength weak
newest_evidence 2015
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-09
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 2 — kristin-reedy-2015, kristin-reedy-2015-2

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.