Claims

Generating or comparing keywords had no substantial effect on posttest learning performance

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2021 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? The three conditions did not differ significantly in posttest performance, indicating keyword generation and comparison affected judgment accuracy rather than learning itself in this study. → Waldeyer 2021

Evidence

Waldeyer 2021

Waldeyer, J., & Roelle, J. (2021). The keyword effect: A conceptual replication, effects on bias, and an optimization. Metacognition and Learning, 16, 37–56. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-020-09235-7

q3 · i? · causal · r2

Preliminary ANOVA comparing the three conditions on the 20-item inference posttest (Cronbach's α = .61). "we did not find a statistically significant difference between the groups regarding posttest performance", F(2, 105) = 2.57, p = .082; the printed ηp2 = .05 was descriptive of this non-significant test.

"we did not find a statistically significant difference between the groups regarding posttest performance, F(2, 105) = 2.57, p =. 0 8 2 ,ηp2 =. 0 5"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id keyword-generation-no-posttest-learning-effect
title Generating or comparing keywords had no substantial effect on posttest learning performance
description Generating or comparing keywords had no substantial effect on posttest learning performance
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2021
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-19
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — waldeyer-2021

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.