Onsite training skill effects are larger at immediate post‐intervention than at follow‐up, while hybrid skill effects do not differ by assessment point¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · quant-synthesisr3·q3
Currency · newest study 2025 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i? For onsite training, nurses' skills varied significantly between assessment points, with immediate post‐intervention showing a larger effect size (SMD = 0.51); for hybrid training the two assessment points did not differ significantly. → Pumsopa 2025
Evidence¶
Pumsopa 2025¶
Pumsopa, N., Jirapongsuwan, A., Kalampakorn, S., Siri, S., and Klainin‐Yobas, P. (2025). The Effectiveness of Community Nurse Training Programs to Improve Nurses' Competency in Community Settings: a Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis. International Journal of Nursing Practice. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijn.70090
q3 · i? · quant-synthesis · r3
Subgroup analysis based on assessment points found a significant difference for onsite training, "with immediate post‐intervention showing a larger effect size (SMD = 0.51, 95% CI = 0.35, 0.67)", while hybrid training showed no significant difference between assessment points.
"For onsite training, nurses' skills varied significantly between the two subgroups (Chi2 = 4.76, p = 0.030; Figure 8), with immediate post‐intervention showing a larger effect size (SMD = 0.51, 95% CI = 0.35, 0.67). For hybrid training, the two assessment points did not differ significantly in nurses' skills (Chi² = 0.13, p = 0.720)."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Hybrid training produces a larger effect on nurses' skills than onsite training — related
- Knowledge outcomes do not differ between immediate post‐intervention and follow‐up for online or hybrid training — related
- IVR knowledge benefits appear immediately post-intervention but attenuate at later follow-up — related
- Skill retention after simulation is rarely measured; at 2-month follow-up only the VR group maintained significant ISVS improvement — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.