A biophysical LA model showed both auditory thalamic plasticity and intra-amygdala plasticity contribute to fear memory, with thalamic responsiveness essential during learning but dispensable after training¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · reviewr2·q2
Currency · newest study 2016 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? In the biophysical amygdala model, increases in CS responsiveness of auditory thalamic neurons were essential for fear learning, while after training the fear memory was maintained by post-synaptic increases in synaptic efficacy within LA. → Nair 2016
Evidence¶
Nair 2016¶
Nair, S. S., Paré, D. and Vicentic, A. (2016). Biologically based neural circuit modelling for the study of fear learning and extinction. npj Science of Learning. https://doi.org/10.1038/npjscilearn.2016.15
q2 · i? · review · r2
Simulation result of the biophysically realistic LA network model described in the review. The authors report that the model unexpectedly reconciled the afferent-plasticity and intra-amygdala-plasticity views: "the fear memory was maintained by post-synaptic increases in synaptic ef ficacy within LA" after training.
"while increases in the CS responsiveness of auditory thalamic neurons were found to be essential for fear learning in the model, after training they were no longer needed because the fear memory was maintained by post-synaptic increases in synaptic ef ficacy within LA."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- A biophysical model suggested that more excitable LA neurons are preferentially recruited into the fear memory trace via competitive synaptic interactions, validated experimentally — related
- Model ablation of engram neurons showed other neurons emerge to support memory, indicating competitive neuronal interactions underlie learning — related
- Experimental work indicates basolateral amygdala cells activated by appetitive CSs mainly encode behavioural output, not CS identity, challenging amygdalo-centric feedforward accounts — related
- The Hebbian CS–US convergence model of lateral amygdala plasticity is inconsistent with the timing and brevity of LA CS responses — related
- REM theta supports consolidation of select procedural memories such as emotional memory, but not skilled motor memory — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
la-model-thalamic-and-intra-amygdala-plasticity |
title |
A biophysical LA model showed both auditory thalamic plasticity and intra-amygdala plasticity contribute to fear memory, with thalamic responsiveness essential during learning but dispensable after training |
description |
A biophysical LA model showed both auditory thalamic plasticity and intra-amygdala plasticity contribute to fear memory, with thalamic responsiveness essential during learning but dispensable after training |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
weak |
newest_evidence |
2016 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-26 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — nair-2016 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.