Claims

Institutions adopting LA reported success primarily as gaining experience, knowledge, and improved attitudes rather than measurable learning outcomes

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · qualitative r3 · q2
Currency · newest study 2020 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Interview participants had reservations about LA success due to early adoption phase, with most success associated with improvement in experience, knowledge, and attitudes. → Tsai 2020

Evidence

Tsai 2020

Tsai, Yi-Shan, et al. (2020). Learning Analytics in European Higher Education – Trends and Barriers. Computers & Education. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103933

q2 · i? · qualitative · r3

Interview data show "several institutions indicated that ‘gaining experience’ was a positive outcome as it allows institutions to “take things potentially to the next level” (U39, UK)."

"several institutions indicated that ‘gaining experience’ was a positive outcome as it allows institutions to “take things potentially to the next level” (U39, UK)."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-30
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.