Claims

European HE institutions perceive LA primarily as a tool to enhance teaching and institutional management, with teaching and support staff as main users

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associational r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2020 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person · overdue for a recheck since 2025: baselines and conditions change

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? LA is primarily perceived as a tool to enhance teaching and institutional management, making teaching and support staff the main users of LA. → Tsai 2020

Evidence

Tsai 2020

Tsai, Yi-Shan, et al. (2020). Learning Analytics in European Higher Education – Trends and Barriers. Computers & Education. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103933

q2 · i? · associational · r1

Survey and interview data from senior managers at 83 institutions in 24 European countries show "teaching and support staff are found to be the main users of LA and the target audience of training support".

"we observe that LA is primarily perceived as a tool to enhance teaching and institutional management. As a result, teaching and support staff are found to be the main users of LA and the target audience of training support."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-30
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.