Claims

Four reviewed studies examined student-related impacts of LA-supported IBL on learning perception, activity engagement, content knowledge acquisition, and productive discourse

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · review r3 · q2
Currency · newest study 2025 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Four studies examined student-related measurements covering learning perception, activity engagement, content knowledge acquisition, and productive discourse, with reported improvements in engagement and outcomes. → Fan Chen 2025

Evidence

Fan Chen 2025

Fan Chen, Gaowei Chen. (2025). Learning analytics in inquiry-based learning: a systematic review. Education Tech Research Dev. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-025-10507-9

q2 · i? · review · r3

The review reports, from four student-focused primary studies it synthesises, impacts on "learning perception", activity engagement, content knowledge acquisition, and productive discourse; e.g., Dickler et al.'s visualisation reports enabled targeted teacher support improving inquiry engagement.

"Four studies examined student-related measurements to analyse the impact of LA-supported IBL on learning perception (Bodily et al., 2018), activity engagement (Dickler et al., 2021), content knowledge acquisition (Wiley et al., 2023), and productive discourse (de Araujo et al., 2024)."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-29
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.