Students and tutors rated predetermined LAD constructs similarly in importance but differed in suggesting and ranking new constructs¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · design r3 · q2
Currency · newest study 2024 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q2 i? Students and tutors rated the importance of predetermined constructs similarly, with fear of failure showing the biggest difference (M=1.54). → de Vreugd 2024 q2 i? Students and tutors suggested different new constructs and selected different constructs as most important in ranking. → de Vreugd 2024 (2)

Evidence¶

de Vreugd 2024¶

de Vreugd, L., van Leeuwen, A., Jansen, R., & van der Schaaf, M. (2024). Learning Analytics Dashboard Design and Evaluation to Support Student Self-Regulation of Study Behaviour. Journal of Learning Analytics, 11(3), 249–262. https://doi.org/10.18608/jla.2024.8529

q2 · i? · design · r3

Focus groups with students (n=4) and tutors (n=3) using a Nominal Group Technique rated predetermined constructs on 7-point Likert scales. The article reports students and tutors "rated the importance of constructs similarly" with fear of failure showing the biggest difference (M=1.54).

"Overall, students and tutors rated the importance of constructs similarly, with “fear of failure” showing the biggest difference ( M=1.54)."

de Vreugd 2024 (2)¶

de Vreugd, L., van Leeuwen, A., Jansen, R., & van der Schaaf, M. (2024). Learning Analytics Dashboard Design and Evaluation to Support Student Self-Regulation of Study Behaviour. Journal of Learning Analytics, 11(3), 249–262. https://doi.org/10.18608/jla.2024.8529

q2 · i? · design · r3

In the same focus groups, students suggested topics such as mental health and perception of study progress while tutors suggested decision-making skills and study strategy. Table 2 shows "students and tutors selecting different constructs as most important."

"Finally, Table 2 shows the ranking of the importance of each construct, with students and tutors selecting different constructs as most important."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• The LAD was mostly perceived to support student appraisal of study behaviour by providing new insights or awareness — related
• The LAD did not support the preparatory phase because most participants did not use the actionable feedback despite perceiving it as potentially useful — related
• Both educator groups rank research to inform best practices in teaching and learning as the most important research goal — related
• Teachers rated personal efficiency, caring for learners' needs, and societal contribution as similarly highly important purposes of AI — related
• After design adjustments, the LAD achieved good–excellent usability (SUS M = 4.13, equal to 78.25%) — related