Claims

The LAD was mostly perceived to support student appraisal of study behaviour by providing new insights or awareness

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · design r3 · q2
Currency · newest study 2024 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Reflection on study behaviour was impacted for most interviewed students (10), mainly because new insights or awareness was acquired (8). → de Vreugd 2024 q2 i? Some participants indicated their reflection was not impacted (5) because they already actively reflected. → de Vreugd 2024 (2)

Evidence

de Vreugd 2024

de Vreugd, L., van Leeuwen, A., Jansen, R., & van der Schaaf, M. (2024). Learning Analytics Dashboard Design and Evaluation to Support Student Self-Regulation of Study Behaviour. Journal of Learning Analytics, 11(3), 249–262. https://doi.org/10.18608/jla.2024.8529

q2 · i? · design · r3

Semi-structured interviews (n=16) analyzed with reflexive thematic analysis against Kirkpatrick levels found "Reflection on study behaviour was impacted (10), mainly because new insights or awareness was acquired (8)"; e.g., one participant said it provided a better picture so she would not underestimate herself.

"Reflection on study behaviour was impacted (10), mainly because new insights or awareness was acquired (8)."

de Vreugd 2024 (2)

de Vreugd, L., van Leeuwen, A., Jansen, R., & van der Schaaf, M. (2024). Learning Analytics Dashboard Design and Evaluation to Support Student Self-Regulation of Study Behaviour. Journal of Learning Analytics, 11(3), 249–262. https://doi.org/10.18608/jla.2024.8529

q2 · i? · design · r3

In the same interview study, a minority reported no impact on reflection; the article states "Some participants indicated that their reflection was not impacted (5), as they already actively reflected (5)", and some forgot the LAD or put no effort into it.

"Some participants indicated that their reflection was not impacted (5), as they already actively reflected (5)"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id thermos-lad-supported-appraisal-phase
title The LAD was mostly perceived to support student appraisal of study behaviour by providing new insights or awareness
description The LAD was mostly perceived to support student appraisal of study behaviour by providing new insights or awareness
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2024
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-08
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 2 — de-vreugd-2024, de-vreugd-2024-2

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.